Sleeping With Money: Leaving the Workforce to be a Homo Homemaker
@ 6:44 pm
I recognize the potential of my partner Zac easily out-earning me several years from now. Some day I could have the option of dropping out of the workforce if I wanted. When I tell people that, I’m automatically assumed to be lazy or some sort of gold-digger. Or, they take one look at Zac and see he’s the butch one of the relationship, and somehow, me staying at home makes sense — as if it’s OK to think “masculine = more earning power” when only applied to same-sex couples. If none of the above, then I’m accused of acquiescing to gender roles that parallel outdated heterosexual couple dynamics, thereby setting back homosexuals everywhere.
It’s a no win situation with people, except with Zac. He just wants me to be happy in whatever I do with my life.
If I ever do drop out of the workforce, I know what my motivations would be. I really hate office jobs, and I’d rather focus my time on writing. I rather like domestic life also, but so does Zac — except, he loves his field of work enough to make a lasting career out of it. It just so happens his skill set and education are highly valuable.
So what’s with all the judgment towards homo homemakers? And why am I so afraid of outing myself as someone willing to accept a role as a househusband? Why should anyone have this fear?
As I was telling a friend / informal expert on gender roles that I wasn’t looking forward to writing about this topic for this week’s Sleeping With Money edition, the first thing she said was, “But that sounds like the classic problem with capitalism, and high powered jobs like an attorney, etc. One person can only succeed in a job like that if either they’re single and have no one they need to take care of / spend time with, or if they have a ‘support person’ at home who will deal with the nitty gritty details of everyday life (groceries, daycare, maintaining the house, pets, organizing social calendar…) preferably for free.”
What she said pretty much echoed this “Wedded to Work, and in Dire Need of a Wife” article by the New York Times, except my friend’s comment was gender neutral.
According to the Times article, in many two-income families, heterosexual women are wishing for a wife at home that will take care of household responsibilities, or as one interviewee explains:
“Men lock the door and leave. Things could be a wreck or whatever and it doesn’t affect their other world,” Ms. Santana said. “I walk out and worry about the house looking nice, because the kids have play dates, etc. Someone has to worry about that, and it’s usually not the dad.”
I’m not buying it Ms. Santana. Domestic affairs are not just for women. Having immigrant parents from Ecuador meant that I would have to challenge many traditional and cultural values my parents wanted to bring over to the U.S. A woman’s role in a family was one of them.
My dad ran a business and my mom stayed at home to raise five kids. The problem here was that by the time all her kids were old enough to take care of themselves, my mom wanted to get a job so that she could spend money without having to get her husband’s approval first. My dad wouldn’t hear of it. The idea of a working wife was not tolerable to him. (I’m well aware my family has issues — you don’t need to remind me.)
I wanted my mom to have a job, because that’s what she wanted. If she didn’t want to work, I would have supported her in that too. The reality was that she could afford to be a stay at home mom, but the other reality is that it should have been her choice whether she works or not. I’m sure most people would agree with me.
Clearly looking at my mom’s ordeal, I’m not inspired to one day become a househusband to conform to gender roles / sexual positions / other BS. I’d only do it because I’d want to and because, as my informal expert friend helped to point out:
1. Zac wouldn’t make me financially dependent on him.
2. We’d likely negotiate how money is divided and spent.
3. Zac would never hold it against me that he’s the bread winner.
4. We’d likely negotiate expectations of household duties and emotional support.
5. I have a college education and marketable skills that would allow me to return to the workforce.
6. As a gay man, I have many years of experience living contrary to expectations, and thus can make decisions accordingly.
7. I have a choice in whether I want to be househusband.
How much of this was possible for the typical 50’s housewife? It certainly wasn’t for my own mom.
To me, the decision to become a househusband / housewife boils down to whether or not it’s a viable option. It doesn’t get more complicated than that any way you slice it.
But that’s just my perspective. What’s your take on leaving the workforce to become a homo homemaker? Do you think that similar forces are at play as in the heterosexual world, or is the story unique on a case by case basis? I’d love to hear your thoughts.









December 7th, 2007 at 5:58 am
I’m a little bit in that situation right now, actually. I recently left a great-paying job as a software developer to shift careers. Now I’m doing the computer stuff freelance, and going to school to become a massage therapist. When I finish school, I don’t want to work full-time. I want to spend more time at home sewing and baking.
My choice, like yours, comes a lot easier because I’m in a same-sex relationship. It em a little different (politically speaking) because I’m a woman, but again, like you, it’s a choice I’m making. My mother didn’t have that choice — she was in exactly the opposite situation as yours, a single mom without much education and not much at all in the way of financial support. I have the luxury of a college education and a supportive partner.
Politics be damned. I want to bake cookies.
December 7th, 2007 at 6:59 am
I think that actually Ms Santana is probably right - in a standard heterosexual relationship it usually is the woman that is more concerned with the domestic affairs.
In general, choosing to leave the workforce and be a kept person is probably a little limiting. But staying in a job is limiting in itself, you can’t have everything.
December 7th, 2007 at 9:59 am
I’m confident in whether I choose to work or stay home (and probably do other kinds of work–but not conventional office stuff) because I have a choice. As you say, many women didn’t have that and I can’t imagine how frustrating that would be. I was raised by a professor who saw having kids as an exciting new chapter of her life and decided to stay home.
I appreciate her decision and I like that my dad didn’t make her feel less valuable because of it. Nor did he object to her doing various part-time jobs to get out, interact with people, and earn some money. She gave away most of that money, but she liked being able to earn it.
If you decide to be a househusband, I hope it’s a very rewarding experience for you!
December 8th, 2007 at 7:58 am
John: This is a really thought-provoking post. I have a different view about finances and dependence… keep in mind that I’m riddled with money issues and often have bag-lady syndrome.
Allstate has been running ads that offer this statistic:
“The average woman spends 11 years out of the workforce taking care of family. Leaving her without enough money to take care of herself.”
When we relinquish financial control to someone else, there are no guarantees. Gender roles aside, I couldn’t stay home and not make my own money. Some, like you, have greater trust in love and the system. Unfortunately, I’m more jaded.
Great post though and I appreciate you shedding some light on topic typically reserved for the Bugaboo stroller set.
December 10th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Interesting Post John…
While I don’t have a Significant Other }:~< I “may” have run into your problem on another level.
In most cultures males are raised to be the support and women the nurturers with the woman expected to depend on the male.
So you have been raised to feel you have to support (or contribute in a monetarily way) to the relationship.
Where I have run into my similar problem is I retired young (48) and sat home for 4 months before I went stir crazy. I then got a job that is nowhere up near what would be called my “skill level” and get funny (sometimes disapproving…out of college students no less) looks and questions when the subject comes up.
It seems funny that this thing happens on both ends…for you because you want to stay home and and for me because I decided that enough was enough.
Its wonderful that your Zac supports your desire to stay home but What I would suggest…but this is just my own opinion mind you… is that you get a part time job.
Three main reasons…(which are also why I went back to work as well)
1/ You get back into a wider Social Network..I went crazy at home.
2/ You must have “Earned Income” to continue contributing to Tax Free Retirement Funds…Roth IRA’s, 401(k)’s etc.
Interest, Dividends, and Capital Gains don’t count as earned income so if I wanted to continue putting money into the Roths I had to have a “JOB”.
In your case it wouldn’t hurt since GLBT people can’t get married and the inheritance..and most important Social Security Survivor laws are against us..you need to at least have some sort of savings in place in your own name.
Part time work would let you stay at home…have time to write…and you could stick all the money into retirements funds if you wanted.
3/ Health Insurance…The Company I work for has Health Insurance available for a reasonable amount of money…While I’m healthy I still have 16 years until I quality for Medicare so “insurance” is a must if I want to be able to leave something to my heirs.
So now Mr. Mom….Wheres my Glass of Milk and Fresh Baked Peanut Butter Cookie..??? }:~D }:~D }:~D
~ Roland
December 20th, 2007 at 6:46 am
[…] are kids. No matter what your views are on careers and parenting, being a stay-at-home mom (or homo homemaker) puts us at a disadvantage financially. Alternatively, leaving the workforce in middle age to care […]
January 14th, 2008 at 11:20 am
[…] there was still an issue that would come up. You see, my partner is a stay-at-home spouse and enjoys it thoroughly, but she felt that she wasn’t contributing enough financially. So on […]