Recently I had the opportunity to meet with Emily Posner and Amy Dowley of Defending Water For Life and Food and Water Watch, respectively. Amy also works for Take Back the Tap. They’ve both devoted themselves to educating others about the impact of bottled water and working to replace bottled water with more sustainable alternatives. I’ve already posted about the economic reasons for not buying water, but Emily and Amy also brought up some other strong reasons to not buy bottled water.

During the conversation, Emily mentioned a daunting prospect: water may well be the next oil. Less than a week later, Common Dreams affirmed her speculation. Apart from the obvious economics (tap water is approximately $0.002 per gallon, versus the $0.89 to $8.26 per gallon) and environmental issues (the 17.6 million barrels of oil required to create the plastic bottles can fuel more than one million cars), there’s also concern about the repercussions of the water being shipped away from where it’s needed and the transfer of water from the public to the private domain.

It’s hard to imagine, particularly in Maine where the rain can go for days without letting up, concerns about a water shortage. The problem however is that while there is theoretically enough water to go around, it’s not in the right place or in the right quantity. According to the UN, individuals need five liters of water a day to survive in moderate climates, and 50 liters for other needs, such as sanitation and cooking. And with the increased global demand for meat, dairy and fish, the demand for water has increased sixfold in the last fifty years. Yet there are still some one billion people without enough clean water to drink and two billion who do not have enough to clean, drink and eat.

Where does bottled water fit in? Increasingly companies are buying access to water wells and reservoirs and shipping it away at far greater cost than simply creating a distribution and filtration system. To start with, Food and Water Watch Has a list of ten reasons why tap water is better, including local money stays local, public agencies provide water to everyone rather than just those that can afford bottled water, there is more control over prices, if you’re unsatisfied you can vote to change it and there’s transparent decision making because of open meetings and open records, whereas corporations have no such requirements. Perhaps the most important reason though is that water stays local and affordable. Rather than take water away from where it’s needed and potentially strain the existent water supply, water remains available in a more sustainable fashion.

The projection that water is the next oil is a daunting prospect where corporations buy areas with abundant resources so that as demand increases they can increase profit margin at the expense of those who will no longer be able to afford water. This is especially disconcerting since the major three distributors of bottled water (Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Nestle) have spotted track records regarding business practices and the environment. Instead, Food and Water Watch advocates water being held in public trusts, so that it can be made available to all residents with sustainability in mind. Unlike oil, where for many people there is simply no option to stop buying, we can prevent water from becoming the next oil by using the water system that’s already in place.